This Week
  • DHD Ventures plans to spend $20 million to renovate two city buildings.

  • Technology and other factors have brought big changes to commercial building.

  • From Morocco, Joseph Squalli traveled far to become Rooney's Restaurant owner.

  • Gates Automotive Centers grows by connecting with customers.

  • RocMusic director Alexander Pena rallies young music makers.

  • Challenges mount for area companies that do business in Russia.

NAFTA at 20

Rochester Business Journal
March 7, 2014

Given the intense controversy surrounding ratification of the North American Free Trade Agreement 20 years ago, it’s no surprise that debate continues today. And the arguments are not merely academic; as President Barack Obama pushes for new trade deals with European and Pacific nations, views about NAFTA loom large.

So, two decades on, what have we learned about the accord signed by the United States, Canada and Mexico to create a single market of more than 400 million people?

Most importantly, NAFTA has not been the job destroyer many feared it would be. There has been no “giant sucking sound of jobs being pulled out of this country,” as billionaire Ross Perot predicted.

NAFTA’s impact on U.S. jobs remains a matter of interpretation, but most experts agree that critics’ dire warnings missed the mark. An RBJ study of local data at the 10-year mark showed that 2,673 job losses had been certified under the NAFTA Transitional Adjustment Assistance program. Yet some of those job losses—such as Corning Inc.’s layoffs amid the telecom implosion—clearly had little to do with NAFTA.

Moreover, the NAFTA-TAA number was dwarfed by the total reduction of local manufacturing positions during the same period—some 26,500 jobs—or even the downsizing at Eastman Kodak Co., which eliminated 14,800 jobs over that decade.

More recently, a study by the Economic Policy Institute found that New York had lost 34,300 jobs from 1994 to 2010. Yet within the same time frame, the Rochester area alone lost more than 53,000 manufacturing jobs.

So if NAFTA is not the culprit, what explains these numbers? The answer: industry cycles, the lasting effects of the financial crisis and, most significantly, the impact of technological advances. Just ask Kodak.

NAFTA critics also argue that the trade pact has depressed U.S. workers’ wages. But as a recent Institute for International Economics study of NAFTA noted, “Technological change is the major force driving both relative and aver­age real wages in the United States.”

Remaining competitive globally is even more important today than it was 20 years ago. And for Rochester exporters, who saw sales to Mexico and Canada rise sharply under NAFTA, imagine how much more difficult life would be without the free trade agreement.

3/7/14 (c) 2014 Rochester Business Journal. To obtain permission to reprint this article, call 585-546-8303 or email service@rbj.net.



What You're Saying 

Jim Bertolone at 1:00:22 PM on 3/7/2014
To claim that NAFTA had little to do with the loss of manufacturing jobs,citing Kodak and technology,totally ignores increases in employment in Mexico by Kodak and our two auto plants after NAFTA,at the same time they were shedding jobs here.
Jim Bertolone
Rochester AF...  Read More >

Post Your Own Comment

 
Username:
Password:

Not registered? Sign up now!
 

To Do   Text Size
Post CommentPost A Comment eMail Size1
View CommentsView All Comments PrintPrint Size2
ReprintsReprints Size3
  • E-mailed
  • Commented
  • Viewed
RBJ   Google